Ward Weaver, Jr. v. Ron Broomfield
| WARD FRANCIS WEAVER, Jr. |
| RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, San Quentin State Prison |
| 21-99010 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 11/29/2021 directing appointing authority to select appointed counsel for Appellant. [12302506] (DJV) [Entered: 12/01/2021 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Terminated Karen S. Schryver for Ward Francis Weaver Jr. in 21-99010 [12294870] (AF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 A copy of 11/22/2021 order [ # 3 ] was served on appellant individually at: Ward Francis Weaver, Jr., C39361, C.S.P. San Quentin, San Quentin, CA 94974, via U.S. Mail. [12294869] (AF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Karen S. Schryver and Timothy J. Foleys motion to be relieved as counsel of record and for substitution of new counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). Counsel will be appointed by separate order. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority should consider whether the appointment of the Sacramento Office of the Federal Public Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, is appropriate. The appointing authority must send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. The Clerk will serve this order on appellants counsel and on appellant individually at: Ward Francis Weaver, Jr., C39361, C.S.P. San Quentin, San Quentin, CA 94974. The briefing schedule is reset as follows: The opening brief and excerpts of record are due March 25, 2022; the answering brief is due May 24, 2022; and the reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12294864] (AF) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ward Francis Weaver, Jr. motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Karen S. Schryver for Appellant Ward Francis Weaver, Jr. motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 11/15/2021. [12286697] [21-99010] (Schryver, Karen) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ward Francis Weaver Jr. opening brief due 12/17/2021. Appellee Ron Broomfield answering brief due 02/15/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12259650] (BY) [Entered: 10/18/2021 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ward Weaver, Jr. v. Ron Broomfield | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: WARD FRANCIS WEAVER, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Karen S. Schryver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, San Quentin State Prison | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Diane Cary |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
