USA v. Tabias Brinson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TABIAS BRINSON, AKA Lil B, AKA Young Boon Da Goer |
| 22-10103 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KG): Court records show that counsel Robert J. Beles, Esq., was retained to represent appellant before the district court and has not been granted leave to withdraw. Counsel has a duty to continue to represent appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, although appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, counsel Beles remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal and has been entered on the docket as counsel of record. If counsel wishes to withdraw, within 21 days of this order, he must file a motion in this court, which must be accompanied by one of the following: (1) a substitution of counsel showing that new counsel has been retained and has filed a notice of appearance, and paid to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal; (2) a motion to appoint counsel, accompanied by a completed financial affidavit (CJA Form 23); (3) a statement expressing appellants clear and unequivocal request that the court exercise its discretion to permit appellant to proceed on appeal without the assistance of counsel, see 9th Cir. R. 4-1(d); Martinez v. Court of Appeal, 528 U.S. 152 (2000); or (4) an affidavit or signed statement from appellant showing that appellant has been advised of his rights with regard to the appeal and expressly stating that appellant wishes to dismiss the appeal voluntarily, see 9th Cir. R. 27-9.1. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). If counsel does not renew his motion to withdraw, the existing briefing schedule will remain in effect. The Clerk will serve this order and a CJA Form 23 on counsel Beles and appellant individually: UMB278, Santa Rita County Jail, 5325 Broder Blvd., Dublin, CA 94568. [12431037] (AF) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 95 months. Transcript ordered by 05/13/2022. Transcript due 06/13/2022. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 07/22/2022 for Tabias Brinson. Appellee brief due 08/22/2022 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (Pro se filed appeal, counsel still retained) [12429813] (WL) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Tabias Brinson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey David Nedrow |
| Represented By: | Neal Cho Hong |
| Represented By: | Matthew Martin Yelovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: TABIAS BRINSON, AKA Lil B, AKA Young Boon Da Goer | |
| Represented By: | Robert Joseph Beles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.