USA v. Clinton Lewis
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CLINTON MARK LEWIS
Case Number: 22-10186
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 21, 2024 USA V. CLINTON LEWIS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2022 Filing 5 Terminated David Eisenberg I for Clinton Mark Lewis in 22-10186 [12506912] (JMR) [Entered: 08/01/2022 05:02 PM]
August 1, 2022 Filing 4 A copy of 8/1/22 Order [ # 3 ] was served on appellant individually Reg. No. 41708-179, Central Arizona Florence Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 6300, Florence, AZ 85132.. [12506911] (JMR) [Entered: 08/01/2022 05:02 PM]
August 1, 2022 Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) of appellants appointed counsel, David Eisenberg, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record and to appoint new counsel is granted. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the District of Arizona, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority is requested to send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Appellant must designate the reporters transcript by September 6, 2022. The transcript is due October 6, 2022. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due November 15, 2022; the answering brief is due December 15, 2022; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually: Reg. No. 41708-179, Central Arizona Florence Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 6300, Florence, AZ 85132. (Appellate Commissioner) [12506904] (JMR) [Entered: 08/01/2022 05:00 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Clinton Mark Lewis motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Mr. David Eisenberg, I, Esquire for Appellant Clinton Mark Lewis motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 07/29/2022. [12505455] [22-10186] (Eisenberg, David) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:40 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 151 MONTHS. Transcript ordered by 08/19/2022. Transcript due 09/19/2022. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 10/28/2022 for Clinton Mark Lewis. Appellee brief due 11/28/2022 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12505342] (ABT) [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Clinton Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Benjamin Goldberg
Represented By: Jennifer Levinson
Represented By: Gayle L. Helart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CLINTON MARK LEWIS
Represented By: Clinton Mark Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?