Wilson v. Garland
| JUNE MODUPEH WILSON |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1060 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Judith Leslie Wood for Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson. Hearing in Pasadena - Courtroom 1 in Pasadena, on 1/12/2024 9:30:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: I wish to appear in person. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/30/2023 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, January 12, 2024 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-1060] [Entered: 10/29/2023 06:18 AM] |
| Filing 33 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Judith Leslie Wood. [Entered: 09/20/2023 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 32 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1060] [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Judith Leslie Wood. [Entered: 08/17/2023 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 30 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for December 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1060] [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:02 AM] |
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 28) for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. Petitioners reply brief is due July 10, 2023. [Entered: 05/11/2023 05:06 PM]
|
| Filing 28 MOTION to extend time to to file reply brief filed by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson. [Entered: 05/11/2023 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 27 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 04/27/2023 02:22 PM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 04/19/2023 05:25 PM]
|
| Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/19/2023 09:05 AM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 23) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 4/20/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/03/2023 07:28 AM]
|
| Filing 23 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/03/2023 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 22 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent John Frederick Stanton representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/06/2023 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 21 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/06/2023 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing John Frederick Stanton. [Entered: 02/06/2023 06:40 AM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson received. [Entered: 01/27/2023 05:10 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/24/2023 02:42 PM]
|
| Filing 17 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached addendum] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:58 PM] [Edited: 01/24/2023 02:38 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 20, 2023. The answering brief is due March 21, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:31 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson. [Entered: 11/21/2022 10:19 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 21, 2022. The answering brief is due January 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/08/2022 04:07:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner June Modupeh Wilson. [Entered: 09/07/2022 01:10:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/08/2022 12:07:00 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/05/2022 07:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/20/2022 05:13:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 FEE PAID by Judith Wood, check # 9024 for $500.00, Receipt #4709005515. [Entered: 06/28/2022 03:21:00 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 06/21/2022 02:10:00 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED John Frederick Stanton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/21/2022 10:31:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Frederick Stanton for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/21/2022 10:26:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/22/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 8/12/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/20/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/21/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:19:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/17/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1060 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:17:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/17/2022 10:07:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/17/2022 10:06:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JUNE MODUPEH WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Judith Leslie Wood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Anthony Nardi |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. John Frederick Stanton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
