Oh v. Garland
| KYONG TAEK OH |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1087 |
| June 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MANDATE ISSUED Kim McLane WARDLAW, Richard R. CLIFTON, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ [Entered: 03/24/2023 11:05 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming without opinion an immigration judges denial of cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review this discretionary determination. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Patel v. Garland, 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1622-23 (2022) (where the agency denies a form of relief listed in 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), federal courts have jurisdiction to review constitutional claims and questions of law, but not factual findings and discretionary decisions). The petition does not raise a colorable legal or constitutional claim over which we retain jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(D); Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir. 2001). The governments motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 12) is granted. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:11 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/23/2022 06:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Nehal Kamani representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Aric Allan Anderson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/30/2022 09:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Aric Allan Anderson for Merrick B. Garland replacing Nehal Kamani. [Entered: 09/30/2022 08:59:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Petitioner Kyong Taek Oh is filed. Original and 7 copies. [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Kyong Taek Oh. [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/26/2022 08:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Nehal Kamani for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2022 09:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nehal Kamani for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/23/2022 08:41:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/27/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/25/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/22/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1087 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:36:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Oh v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KYONG TAEK OH | |
| Represented By: | Kyong Taek Oh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Aric Allan Anderson |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Nehal Kamani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
