Medina Rosales, et al. v. Garland
| MARIA DE LOS ANGELES MEDINA RODALES and XOCHITL GUADALUPE CERVANTES MEDINA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1238 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| MEDINA RODALES, ET AL. V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1238] [Entered: 11/03/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 33 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1238] [Entered: 10/06/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 32 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 30 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/26/2023 12:46 PM] |
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 30 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/20/2023 12:16 PM]
|
| Filing 30 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/19/2023 01:27 PM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 28) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 9/21/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/11/2023 08:49 AM]
|
| Filing 28 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/11/2023 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 27 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioner Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rodales, Petitioner Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina received. [Entered: 07/11/2023 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 26 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Michele Yvette Frances Sarko representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/28/2023 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 25 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew Nathan O'Malley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/28/2023 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Nathan O'Malley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Michele Yvette Frances Sarko. [Entered: 06/28/2023 12:23 PM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioners Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rodales and Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/26/2023 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 22 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rodales, Petitioner Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina. [Entered: 06/23/2023 03:22 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Richard A. PAEZ, Paul J. WATFORD, Danielle J. FORREST Petitioners opposed motion to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 16) is denied. The opening brief is due June 23, 2023. The answering brief is due August 22, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:31 AM]
|
| Filing 20 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION. [Entered: 01/30/2023 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 19 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 1/27/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion to Remand (DE 16) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/05/2023 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 17 MEDIATION ORDER FILED. The motion to remand, filed November 23, 2022, has been referred to the mediation unit. If no response is filed by January 5, 2023, the motion will be granted without further notice. Further, unless either party files an objection to this order by January 5, 2023, the parties will be deemed to have agreed that the Courts remand order should stay petitioners removal pending a Board decision in this matter. See Ninth Circuit General Order, Appendix A(52). Either party may contact the mediator at Stephen_Liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov to request an assessment conference, to discuss settlement of this matter or with other relevant questions. FOR THE [Entered: 12/22/2022 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to remand case filed by Petitioner Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rosales, Petitioner Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina. [Entered: 11/23/2022 05:39 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/23/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:13 AM]
|
| Filing 14 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rosales, Petitioner Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina. [Entered: 10/22/2022 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Sean Paul Perdomo for Petitioner Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina, Petitioner Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rosales. [Entered: 10/03/2022 10:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sean Paul Perdomo for Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rosales, Sean Paul Perdomo for Xochitl Guadalupe Cervantes Medina. [Entered: 10/01/2022 05:56:00 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/15/2022 12:15:00 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/15/2022 11:27:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/19/2022 06:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Michele Yvette Frances Sarko for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:57:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michele Yvette Frances Sarko for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/21/2022 10:59:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 8/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 9/15/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/24/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/23/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/21/2022 10:05:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/20/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1238 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/21/2022 10:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 6/21/2022. [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:08:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 6/21/2022. [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:02:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
