Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, et al. v. Garland
| ROSA MAGLENY ORTIZ HERNANDEZ DE CORONADO, ELENA SOFIA CORONADO ORTIZ, JOSE ANTONIO CORONADO VARGAS and HUGO JOSE CORONADO ORTIZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1242 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ORTIZ HERNANDEZ DE CORONADO, ET AL. V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 39 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Justin D. Sweeney for Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 1/11/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: [-]. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: [-]. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 11/08/2023 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 38 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Stephanie Leigh Groff for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 1/11/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: I wish to appear in person. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 11/08/2023 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, January 11, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-1242] [Entered: 10/29/2023 06:19 AM] |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Justin D. Sweeney. [Entered: 09/20/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 35 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1242] [Entered: 09/19/2023 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 34 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Justin D. Sweeney. [Entered: 08/17/2023 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 33 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for December 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1242] [Entered: 08/16/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 32 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 30 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 08/04/2023 03:14 PM] |
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 30 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:22 PM]
|
| Filing 30 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF] [Entered: 07/26/2023 03:01 PM] [Edited: 07/28/2023 03:07 PM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 28) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 7/28/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/28/2023 08:10 AM]
|
| Filing 28 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz. [Entered: 06/27/2023 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 27 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 06/14/2023 11:30 AM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/08/2023 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/07/2023 04:21 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Respondent's motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 7, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/04/2023 04:19 PM]
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/04/2023 07:04 AM] |
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 8, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/17/2023 03:56 PM]
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/17/2023 09:57 AM] |
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due April 24, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/21/2023 02:24 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/20/2023 11:51 AM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due March 24, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/13/2023 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/13/2023 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 11/25/2022 03:40 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:17 AM]
|
| Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs] [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:55 PM] [Edited: 11/22/2022 11:12 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/23/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:38 AM]
|
| Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz. [Entered: 10/21/2022 08:38 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/15/2022 11:07:00 AM]
|
| Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/22/2022 05:00:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Stephanie Leigh Groff for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/22/2022 09:27:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephanie Leigh Groff for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/22/2022 06:59:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Stay Removal (entry 3) filed by Petitioner Jose Antonio Coronado Vargas, Petitioner Elena Sofia Coronado Ortiz, Petitioner Rosa Magleny Ortiz Hernandez de Coronado, Petitioner Hugo Jose Coronado Ortiz. [Entered: 07/21/2022 02:38:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 8/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 9/15/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/24/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/23/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/21/2022 02:28:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/21/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1242 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/21/2022 02:25:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/21/2022 01:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 6/21/2022. [Entered: 07/21/2022 01:52:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/21/2022 01:50:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
