Nouman v. Garland
Petitioner: KHURRAM NOUMAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1309
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER FILED. William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Mark J. BENNETT Petitioners opposed motion to reinstate this petition for review (Docket Entry No. 24) is granted. See Meyers v. Birdsong, No. 17-16907, 2023 WL 6614357, at *2 (9th Cir. Oct. 11, 2023) (addressing standards for reinstatement). The order of dismissal for failure to prosecute (Docket Entry No. 12) is vacated. The petition for review is reinstated. The temporary stay of removal is restored. The opening brief is due December 11, 2023. The answering brief is due January 10, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/26/2023 03:03 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 28 REPLY to (DE 25) filed by Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:42 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 27 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Matt Adams for Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/21/2023 01:58 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matt Adams for Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/21/2023 01:42 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 25 RESPONSE to Motion Motion to Reinstate (DE 24) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/19/2023 08:36 AM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION to Reinstate filed by Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/18/2023 04:06 PM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 23 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Glenda M. Aldana Madrid for Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:52 PM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 22 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Andrea Maria Lino for Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:51 PM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Glenda M. Aldana Madrid for Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 09/18/2023 02:55 PM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrea Maria Lino for Petitioner Khurram Nouman replacing Mark Barrett Nerheim. [Entered: 09/18/2023 02:41 PM]
June 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. The motion to reinstate (Docket Entry No. 13) does not include the opening brief. The court will take no action on the motion. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 2.4. This case remains closed. [Entered: 06/02/2023 09:17 AM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 18 OPPOSITION TO RENEWED MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/09/2023 01:37 PM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion to Reinstate (DE 13) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/09/2023 01:36 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 16 RENEWED MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 15.] [Entered: 05/08/2023 12:32 PM] [Edited: 05/08/2023 12:38 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE---MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 16.] [Entered: 05/05/2023 06:37 PM] [Edited: 05/08/2023 12:37 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE---SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered in error, correct entry is DE 15.] [Edited: 05/05/2023 03:45 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to reinstate case filed by Petitioner Khurram Nouman. [Entered: 05/05/2023 02:19 PM]
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:59 AM]
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/13/2022 12:13:00 PM]
September 13, 2022 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/13/2022 08:39:00 AM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 09/01/2022 06:25:00 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 8 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 6; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 9/29/2022. [Entered: 08/15/2022 02:54:00 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 7 DEFECTIVE---MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:38:00 AM] Filed twice [Edited: 08/15/2022 02:59:00 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:32:00 AM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Aric Allan Anderson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/04/2022 11:59:00 AM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Aric Allan Anderson for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/04/2022 10:50:00 AM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/8/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/7/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/6/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/04/2022 09:00:00 AM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/3/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1309 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/04/2022 08:58:00 AM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/03/2022 08:21:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nouman v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KHURRAM NOUMAN
Represented By: Matt Adams
Represented By: Andrea Maria Lino
Represented By: Glenda M. Aldana Madrid
Represented By: Mark Barrett Nerheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. Aric Allan Anderson
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?