Gardea Cereceres v. Garland
| FRANCISCO GARDEA CERECERES |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-134 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
MANDATE ISSUED Michael Daly HAWKINS, Sidney R. THOMAS, M. Margaret McKEOWN [Entered: 09/11/2023 10:01 AM]
|
|
Filing 27
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Michael Daly HAWKINS, Sidney R. THOMAS, M. Margaret McKEOWN) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 07/19/2023 12:57 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 25 by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres. [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 25] [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:12 PM] [Edited: 12/05/2022 02:19 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 22) granted. Amended briefing schedule: The optional Reply Brief is due 11/30/2022. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres. [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:32 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/12/2022 11:07 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/11/2022 08:32 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/19/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:53:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:19:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres. [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:17:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/21/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/19/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:43:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Francisco Gardea Cereceres. [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:18:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Richard A. PAEZ, Paul J. WATFORD The court, in its discretion, denies the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4). The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 2) is granted. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). The stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. The certified administrative record has been filed. The opening brief is due June 21, 2022. The answering brief is due August 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:24:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/18/2022 07:18:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 02/24/2022 09:44:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted. [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:14:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ADDED Stephen Finn for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/24/2022 09:04:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Finn for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/24/2022 08:33:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 3/18/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:12:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/21/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-134 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:10:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/21/2022 10:58:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/21/2022 10:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/21/2022 10:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/21/2022 10:56:00 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gardea Cereceres v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRANCISCO GARDEA CERECERES | |
| Represented By: | Francisco Gardea Cereceres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Stephen Finn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
