Ramos Mendez, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS RAMOS MENDEZ, JEIMY MARISOL RAMOS-GONZALEZ and JOSUE ALEXANDER RAMOS-GONZALEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1421
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2023 Filing 32 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Rachel Louise Browning representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/03/2023 01:49 PM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 31 ADDED Counsel for Respondent John Frederick Stanton [Entered: 11/03/2023 01:47 PM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 30 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Frederick Stanton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Rachel Louise Browning. [Entered: 11/03/2023 12:26 PM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 27 by Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez received. [Entered: 10/26/2023 03:47 PM]
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 27 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/23/2023 12:15 PM]
October 20, 2023 Filing 27 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 10/20/2023 08:50 PM]
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry Nos. 24 and 25) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted in part. The opening brief is due October 20, 2023. The answering brief is due December 19, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/29/2023 02:45 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 25 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 24) filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 08/14/2023 02:43 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 08/14/2023 02:07 PM]
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is denied without prejudice to a renewed motion accompanied by a declaration stating the reason an extension is necessary. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b)(4). The opening brief is due August 21, 2023. The answering brief is due October 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/07/2023 10:31 AM]
July 25, 2023 Filing 22 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:23 PM]
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 20) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 31, 2023. The answering brief is due September 29, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/17/2023 04:35 PM]
May 26, 2023 Filing 20 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 05/26/2023 03:47 PM]
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 30, 2023. The answering brief is due July 28, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/11/2023 02:53 PM]
April 7, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 04/07/2023 12:05 PM]
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 28, 2023. The answering brief is due May 30, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/25/2023 03:38 PM]
January 24, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:58 AM]
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 27, 2023. The answering brief is due March 28, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/07/2022 11:06 AM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 12/06/2022 02:46 PM]
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) denied. The request is late. The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:46 PM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Petitioner Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Petitioner Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:40 PM]
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/21/2022 11:39 AM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/20/2022 08:47 PM]
September 19, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 09/19/2022 05:01:00 AM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 8 Fee Paid by Jeimy Marisol Ramos-Gonzalez, Jose Luis Ramos Mendez, Josue Alexander Ramos-Gonzalez. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2602137-ACMS. [Entered: 08/31/2022 11:11:00 AM]
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:46:00 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Rachel Louise Browning for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2022 09:54:00 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2022 09:52:00 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/29/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 10/20/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/28/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/25/2022 09:00:00 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/24/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1421 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/25/2022 08:58:00 AM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/24/2022 05:22:00 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/24/2022 05:21:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ramos Mendez, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS RAMOS MENDEZ
Represented By: Sarah Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JEIMY MARISOL RAMOS-GONZALEZ
Represented By: Sarah Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSUE ALEXANDER RAMOS-GONZALEZ
Represented By: Sarah Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. John Frederick Stanton
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Rachel Louise Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?