Perez-De Rujel, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: MARIA CRISTINA PEREZ-DE RUJEL and LUIS ENRIQUE RUJEL-PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1460
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioners Maria Cristina Perez-De Rujel and Luis Enrique Rujel-Perez. Original and 7 copies. [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:16 PM]
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 11), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 11/10/2022 02:55 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of change of address filed by Petitioner Maria Cristina Perez-De Rujel. [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:39 PM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:45:00 AM]
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/22/2022 11:49:00 AM]
September 22, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/22/2022 09:28:00 AM]
September 22, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 09/22/2022 06:26:00 AM]
September 2, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Stephen Finn for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/02/2022 09:54:00 AM]
September 2, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Finn for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/02/2022 09:46:00 AM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 5 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt# 4709005576) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:01:00 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/6/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 10/27/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/5/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 2/3/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:39:00 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/1/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1460 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:37:00 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:02:00 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:01:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Perez-De Rujel, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARIA CRISTINA PEREZ-DE RUJEL
Represented By: Maria Cristina Perez-De Rujel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LUIS ENRIQUE RUJEL-PEREZ
Represented By: Luis Enrique Rujel-Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Stephen Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?