George Austin v. Lyft, Inc.
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Esq. |
LYFT, INC. |
22-15009 |
January 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Jobs |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MANDATE ISSUED. (RCT, MBC and JHN) [12370259] (DJV) [Entered: 02/15/2022 06:30 AM] |
Filing 10 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/25/2022 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis denied. [12353241] (DJV) [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:26 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed order (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12349250] (AF) [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:58 PM] |
Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. Date of service: 01/23/2022. [12348241] [22-15009] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/23/2022 07:51 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin EMERGENCY Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 01/04/2022. Date of service: 01/18/2022. [12342525] [22-15009] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:25 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Correspondence: Notice that Defendant Lyft has already lost, per FRCP and CA CCP, and Plaintiff/Appellant, George Jarvis Austin, has already won, due to Def. Lyft's non-appearance, or answer, by deadline passed earlier today (including 10 day grace period per CCP).. Date of service: 01/13/2022 [12340734] [22-15009] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/13/2022 05:37 PM] |
Filing 5 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court (2 of 2) . [12331434] (DJV) [Entered: 01/05/2022 06:35 AM] |
Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. (one of two) [12331433] (DJV) [Entered: 01/05/2022 06:34 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 01/04/2022. [12331394] [22-15009] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/04/2022 06:43 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 01/04/2022. [12331389] [22-15009] (Austin, George) [Entered: 01/04/2022 06:28 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant George Jarvis Austin opening brief due 03/07/2022. [12331059] (RT) [Entered: 01/04/2022 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: George Austin v. Lyft, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Esq. | |
Represented By: | George Jarvis Austin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: LYFT, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.