Craig Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police, et al
| CRAIG DOUGLAS ALLEN |
| CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENTD, MEDIA-LAB, MATT JACOBS and BERT REED |
| 22-15030 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CRAIG ALLEN V. CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 01/28/2022. [12355047] (RT) [Entered: 01/28/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (RK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in that pilot project. By February 17, 2022,the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or in the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12353202] (WL) [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Craig Douglas Allen application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/02/2022. [12339765] (RL) [Entered: 01/13/2022 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12335090] (CKP) [Entered: 01/09/2022 02:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-15030: Due] ). [12335088] (CKP) [Entered: 01/09/2022 02:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received Appellant Craig Douglas Allen notice regarding Notice of Appeal. [12334681] (RR) [Entered: 01/07/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE, AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 02/04/2022. Transcript due 03/07/2022. Appellant Craig Douglas Allen opening brief due 04/15/2022. Appellee City of Citrus Heights Police Departmentd answering brief due 05/16/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12334129] (HH) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
