Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
| PAUL DAVID JOHNSON |
| JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D., DR. A. J. FILICE, YUEN CHEN, M.D., COLLINSWORTH, M.D., J. CRAMMER, Physician, PA CTF, WIN, HLA, M.D., NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, M. KIM, M.D., CMO, J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, M SPEARMAN, Warden of CTF and IAN CRANMER, PA-C |
| 22-15050 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, MARSHA S. BERZON and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the December 28, 2021 orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable); Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12379333] (OC) [Entered: 02/24/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief of 13 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 02/03/2022. [12373772] (KT) [Entered: 02/17/2022 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief due 03/14/2022. Appellees Norma Acquva, J. A. Beard, Yuen Chen, Joseph Chudy, Collinsworth, J. Crammer, Ian Cranmer, A. J. Filice, M. Kim, F. Kreitler, L. W. Rohlfing, M Spearman, Thuddy, A. Traquina and Win answering brief due 04/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12338946] (RT) [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
