Daniel Martin v. Clark County, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee: CLARK COUNTY, JOHN MARTIN and MARCUS MCANALLY
Case Number: 22-15094
Filed: January 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2022 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Daniel Martin Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 03/07/2022. [12387281] [22-15094] (Kemp, James) [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:45 AM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12378538] (CL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 06:03 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12370173] (AF) [Entered: 02/14/2022 06:10 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/22/2022, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12357973] (CL) [Entered: 02/01/2022 04:26 PM]
January 25, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/25/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12350468]. [22-15094] (AD) [Entered: 01/25/2022 12:44 PM]
January 25, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Daniel Martin Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/25/2022. [12349876] [22-15094] (Kemp, James) [Entered: 01/25/2022 09:05 AM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Daniel Martin Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/31/2022. Appellant Daniel Martin opening brief due 03/28/2022. Appellees Clark County, John Martin and Marcus McAnally answering brief due 04/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12348588] (RT) [Entered: 01/24/2022 10:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Martin v. Clark County, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DANIEL MARTIN
Represented By: James P. Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CLARK COUNTY
Represented By: Scott Rulon Davis
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Rogan Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN MARTIN
Represented By: Scott Rulon Davis
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Rogan Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARCUS MCANALLY
Represented By: Scott Rulon Davis
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Rogan Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?