Leanne Albers v. Paul Revere Insurance Group, et al
| LEANNE ALBERS |
| PAUL REVERE INSURANCE GROUP and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| 22-15100 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LEANNE ALBERS V. PAUL REVERE INSURANCE GROUP, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (SJS): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant's opening brief is due June 21, 2022; appellees' answering brief is due July 21, 2022; appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. A video mediation will be held on April 22, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, with Circuit Mediator, Steven Saltiel. Unless excused by the Circuit Mediator prior to the scheduled conference, each party shall be represented by counsel of record and a client representative having full authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms at the conference. No later than seven (7) days before the mediation, counsel is requested to inform the mediator by email of the names and email address of planned participants. Each participant will receive an email with video instructions only they can use to participate in the conference. Please notify the Circuit Mediator if counsel does not receive an email or if additional participants should be added. Mediation statements shall be submitted to the Circuit Mediator via e-mail [Steven_Saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov] on or before April 15, 2022 by 12:00 p.m. (Noon).....Mediation statements shall not be filed with the court. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12384747] (AF) [Entered: 03/02/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/25/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12359476] (CL) [Entered: 02/02/2022 05:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12357450]. [22-15100] (AD) [Entered: 02/01/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leanne Albers Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/01/2022. [12357200] [22-15100] (Reilly, William) [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) William Reilly for party(s) Appellant Leanne Albers, in case 22-15100. [12356988] (WL) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court dated 01/23/22. [12349736] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Leanne Albers Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/31/2022. Appellant Leanne Albers opening brief due 03/28/2022. Appellees Paul Revere Insurance Group and Unum Life Insurance Company of America answering brief due 04/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12348813] (RT) [Entered: 01/24/2022 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
