Jimmy Wheeler v. Mark Inch, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIMMY LEE WHEELER
Defendant / Appellee: MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, T. BOWDEN, Assistant Warden/Secretary's Representative and J. CORNIELS
Case Number: 22-15181
Filed: February 7, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 Filing 10 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: No). Served on 03/14/2022. (OSC pending, briefing remains stayed) [12402043] (KWG) [Entered: 03/22/2022 03:26 PM]
March 15, 2022 Filing 9 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit Rules, the docket sheet and DE 7 in response to the Form 29 request received on 03/15/2022. [12395308] (JR) [Entered: 03/15/2022 02:05 PM]
March 15, 2022 Filing 8 Received Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler request for copy of FRAP Rules, copy of docket sheet, & copy of recorded appeals notice. [12395287] (NAC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 01:56 PM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 7 Received Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler notice to the Clerk of the Court. [12384385] (NAC) [Entered: 03/02/2022 01:36 PM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12381814] (NAC) [Entered: 02/28/2022 12:57 PM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler statement that appeal should go forward [12381811] (NAC) [Entered: 02/28/2022 12:55 PM]
February 9, 2022 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12365718] (CKP) [Entered: 02/09/2022 04:30 PM]
February 8, 2022 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/08/2022. Revoking IFP Status [12363714] (NAC) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:20 AM]
February 7, 2022 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12363070] (CKP) [Entered: 02/07/2022 03:24 PM]
February 7, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jimmy Lee Wheeler opening brief due 04/04/2022. [12362709] (JMR) [Entered: 02/07/2022 01:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jimmy Wheeler v. Mark Inch, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JIMMY LEE WHEELER
Represented By: Jimmy Lee Wheeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: T. BOWDEN, Assistant Warden/Secretary's Representative
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. CORNIELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?