Rika Shimizu v. Mina Takamura, et al
| RIKA SHIMIZU |
| MINA TAKAMURA, RIKUTA TAKAMURA, TAKESHI NAMBU, TOMOKO MATSUKAWA and THOMAS E. BUSH |
| 22-15312 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for a 90 day stay of this appeal is treated as a motion for an extension of time to respond to the courts March 18, 2022 order. The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) is granted. The response to the March 18, 2022 order is now due June 30, 2022. If appellant does not file a response to the March 18, 2022 order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing remains stayed pending resolution of the March 18, 2022 order. [12424030] (AF) [Entered: 04/18/2022 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu motion for stay of appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/27/2022. [12405839] (DJV) [Entered: 03/28/2022 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. AT/MOATT 2 22-15312 The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. All pending motions will be addressed following resolution of this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12399549] (AF) [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu in 22-15312 motion to consolidate case number22-15195. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/08/2022. [12391117] [22-15312, 22-15195] (DJV) [Entered: 03/10/2022 07:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu letter dated 03/08/2022 re: designation of items to be included on appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12389415] (DJV) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu letter dated 03/08/2022 re: addendum to DE 3. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12389413] (DJV) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu letter dated 03/08/2022 re: no transcripts for appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12389409] (DJV) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Rika Shimizu motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/08/2022. [12389405] (DJV) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12385505] (CKP) [Entered: 03/03/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rika Shimizu opening brief due 05/04/2022. [12384727] (RT) [Entered: 03/02/2022 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
