Demetrius Brock v. Renee Baker
Petitioner / Appellant: DEMETRIUS LAMAR BROCK
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden
Case Number: 22-15325
Filed: March 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Demetrius Lamar Brock Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 04/05/2022. [12413476] [22-15325] (Oram, Christopher) [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:54 PM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/01/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12385725] (OC) [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Demetrius Brock v. Renee Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DEMETRIUS LAMAR BROCK
Represented By: Christopher Oram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden
Represented By: Jaimie Stilz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?