Richard Evans v. R. Milam, et al
| RICHARD A. EVANS |
| R. MILAM, Plant Operations at SATF, LEFFMAN and S. SHERMAN, Warden at SATF |
| 22-15351 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, served on March 2, 2022 and filed on March 7, 2022, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on October 25, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12427051] (OC) [Entered: 04/20/2022 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Richard A. Evans opening brief due 05/06/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12390174] (ABT) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
