Aargon Agency, Inc., et al v. Sandy O'Laughlin
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARGON AGENCY, INC., Nevada corporation, ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, ASSETCARE, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, CAPIO PARTNERS, LLC, a Texas limlited liabilty company, CF MEDICAL, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICE, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, COLLECTION SERVICE OF NEVADA, a Nevada corporation, NEVADA COLLECTORS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation, PLUSFOUR, INC., a Nevada corporation, RM GALICIA, INC., doing business as Progressive Management, LLC, THE LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL D. BLUHM & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and CAPIO PARTNERS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: SANDY O'LAUGHLIN, in her capacity as Commissioner of State Of Nevada Department Of Business And Industry Financial Institutions Division
Amicus Curiae: NEVADA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 22-15352
Filed: March 9, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 15, 2023 Summary AARGON AGENCY, INC., ET AL V. SANDY O'LAUGHLIN

RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MANDATE ISSUED.(WAF, JSB and LVD) [12750269] (RL) [Entered: 07/07/2023 08:41 AM]
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FILED OPINION (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, JAY S. BYBEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) AFFIRMED. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher; Dissent by Judge VanDyke. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12736547] (AKM) [Entered: 06/15/2023 10:07 AM]
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The motion to become amicus, Dkt. No. [ # 14 ], is granted. [12736541] (AKM) [Entered: 06/15/2023 10:05 AM]
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ [12532934] (LW) [Entered: 09/02/2022 04:01 PM]
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, JAY S. BYBEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE. [12532788] (DB) [Entered: 09/02/2022 02:37 PM]
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Kiel Ireland for Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin. Hearing in San Francisco on 09/02/2022 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 06/30/2022. [12483931] [22-15352] (Ireland, Kiel) [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:26 AM]
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Patrick J. Reilly for Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Hearing in San Francisco on 09/02/2022 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 06/21/2022. [12475578] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:59 AM]
June 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, September 2, 2022 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Check # here for updates on the status of reopening as the hearing date approaches. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination . The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Friday, September 2, 2022. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12474853]. [22-15352] (KS) [Entered: 06/19/2022 06:10 AM]
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 34 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [12458396] (SD) [Entered: 05/27/2022 12:13 PM]
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 33 ] filed by Appellants. [12458393] (SD) [Entered: 05/27/2022 12:10 PM]
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 33 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 34 ] submitted by appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12456044] (KT) [Entered: 05/25/2022 11:18 AM]
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Date of service: 05/24/2022. [12455250] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 05/24/2022 02:45 PM]
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Date of service: 05/24/2022. [12455229] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 05/24/2022 02:40 PM]
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Kiel Ireland for Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 05/20/2022. [12452540] [22-15352] (Ireland, Kiel) [Entered: 05/20/2022 12:29 PM]
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Added Attorney(s) Kiel Ireland for party(s) Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin. [12452537] (RL) [Entered: 05/20/2022 12:23 PM]
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kiel Brunetti Ireland (State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General, 100 North Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701) for Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin. Date of service: 05/20/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12452532] [22-15352] (Ireland, Kiel) [Entered: 05/20/2022 12:22 PM]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Added Attorney(s) David Israel for party(s) Appellant RM Galicia, Inc. Appellant AssetCare, LLC Appellant Capio Partners, LLC Appellant CF Medical, LLC Appellant The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. [12451800] (RL) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:17 PM]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of David Israel (Sessions Israel & Shartle 3850 N. Causeway Boulevard, Suite 200, Metairie, LA 70002-7227) for Appellants AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Date of service: 05/19/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12451784] [22-15352] (Israel, David) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:08 PM]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Filed (ECF) Attorney Rusty Graf for Amicus Curiae - Pending Nevada Hospital Association response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 05/19/2022. [12451388] [22-15352] (Graf, Rusty) [Entered: 05/19/2022 12:20 PM]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Patrick J. Reilly for Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 05/19/2022. [12450939] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 05/19/2022 08:26 AM]
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for August 29 September 2 & September 19 September 23, 2022 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12449446] (DJH) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:37 PM]
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 22 ] filed by Sandy O'Laughlin. [12441748] (SD) [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:00 PM]
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 22 ] submitted by Sandy O'Laughlin is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12438617] (SML) [Entered: 05/04/2022 05:34 PM]
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin. Date of service: 05/03/2022. [12437507] [22-15352] (Levin, Akke) [Entered: 05/03/2022 07:40 PM]
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Received 6 paper copies of Amicus Brief [ # 14 ] filed by Nevada Hospital Association. [12435934] (SD) [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:57 AM]
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The motion of Nevada Hospital Association for leave to file an amicus curiae brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 14 ]) is referred to the panel assigned to hear the merits of this appeal. Within 7 days after the date of this order, the prospective amicus is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format with green covers, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is available on the courts website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The address for regular U.S. mail is P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. The address for overnight mail is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103- 1526. [12431495] (RY) [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:10 PM]
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae - Pending Nevada Hospital Association. [12427263] (SML) [Entered: 04/21/2022 08:32 AM]
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 8 ] in 5 volume(s) and index volume filed by appellants. [12426698] (CPA) [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:29 PM]
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 11 ] filed by appellants. [12426670] (CPA) [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:17 PM]
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 11 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 8 ] submitted by appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12421967] (SML) [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:40 PM]
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The unopposed motion for leave to file a substitute opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) is granted. The Clerk will strike the opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. [9]. The Clerk will file the opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ] and the excerpts of record submitted at Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]. The answering brief remains due May 3, 2022. The optional reply brief remains due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12421287] (WL) [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:20 AM]
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) Amicus brief for review and filed Motion to become amicus curiae. Submitted by Nevada Hospital Association. Date of service: 04/14/2022. [12421090] [22-15352]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected documents and updated entry to correctly reflect content of filing. 04/21/2022 by SML] (Graf, Rusty) [Entered: 04/14/2022 09:56 AM]
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 14 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Motion to become amicus curiae. Date of service: 04/12/2022. [12419214] [22-15352] (Higgins, Brigid) [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:13 PM]
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin response non-opposing motion/form/notice at [ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing). Date of service: 04/11/2022. I certify that I have separately notified all parties not registered for Appellate Electronic Filing in this case with notice of this non-opposition. [12417706] [22-15352] (Shevorski, Steven) [Entered: 04/11/2022 03:20 PM]
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc., The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC and Appellee Sandy O'Laughlin. Date of service: 04/11/2022. [12417166] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 04/11/2022 11:28 AM]
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC Motion to file substitute or corrected brief. Date of service: 04/11/2022. [12417161] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 04/11/2022 11:27 AM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 15 ]. Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Date of service: 04/05/2022. [12413355] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:48 PM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Date of service: 04/05/2022. [12413341] [22-15352]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 04/11/2022 by SML] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:42 PM]
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12403161] (RL) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:04 PM]
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Nevada Collectors Association, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC Correspondence: Appellants' Representation Statement. Date of service: 03/16/2022 [12396179] [22-15352] (Reilly, Patrick) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:39 AM]
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/14/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12393873]. [22-15352] (AD) [Entered: 03/14/2022 12:44 PM]
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc., Allied Collection Services, Inc., AssetCare, LLC, CF Medical, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC, Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Collection Service Of Nevada, Plusfour, Inc., RM Galicia, Inc. and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/14/2022. [12393386] [22-15352] (Schultz, James) [Entered: 03/14/2022 09:29 AM]
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed March 8, 2022 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than April 5, 2022 the answering brief is due May 3, 2022 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12390722] (OC) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:42 PM]
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 3/08/2022. [12390249] (HH) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:50 AM]
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Aargon Agency, Inc. et al. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/16/2022. Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 Preliminary Injunction Appeal. [12390227] (HH) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aargon Agency, Inc., et al v. Sandy O'Laughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: AARGON AGENCY, INC., Nevada corporation
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ASSETCARE, LLC, a Texas limited liability company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Represented By: David Israel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CAPIO PARTNERS, LLC, a Texas limlited liabilty company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CF MEDICAL, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Represented By: David Israel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICE, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: COLLECTION SERVICE OF NEVADA, a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NEVADA COLLECTORS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PLUSFOUR, INC., a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RM GALICIA, INC., doing business as Progressive Management, LLC
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Represented By: David Israel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THE LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL D. BLUHM & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Represented By: David Israel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CAPIO PARTNERS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company
Represented By: Patrick J. Reilly
Represented By: James Kevin Schultz
Represented By: David Israel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SANDY O'LAUGHLIN, in her capacity as Commissioner of State Of Nevada Department Of Business And Industry Financial Institutions Division
Represented By: Akke Levin
Represented By: Steven G. Shevorski Esquire
Represented By: Kiel Ireland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: NEVADA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Rusty Graf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?