Martin Walsh v. Brian Bowers, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant / Appellant: BRIAN J. BOWERS, an individual, DEXTER C. KUBOTA, an individual, BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC., a corporation and BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
Case Number: 22-15378
Filed: March 14, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 25, 2023 Summary JULIE SU V. BRIAN BOWERS, ET AL
January 8, 2024 Summary SU V. BOWERS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12413344] (MS) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:44 PM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/05/2022, 12:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12403141] (CL) [Entered: 03/23/2022 01:52 PM]
March 21, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12400506]. [22-15378] (AD) [Entered: 03/21/2022 12:44 PM]
March 21, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Bowers + Kubota Consulting, Inc., Brian J. Bowers and Dexter C. Kubota Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/21/2022. [12400197] [22-15378] (Johanson, David) [Entered: 03/21/2022 10:11 AM]
March 18, 2022 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Christine Han for party(s) Appellee Martin J. Walsh, in case 22-15378. [12398777] (QDL) [Entered: 03/18/2022 09:39 AM]
March 18, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christine D. Han (U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor Plan Benefits Security Division 200 Constitution Ave. NW, Suite N-4611) for Appellee Martin J. Walsh. Date of service: 03/18/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12398718] [22-15378] (Han, Christine) [Entered: 03/18/2022 09:09 AM]
March 14, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Brian J. Bowers, Bowers + Kubota Consulting, Inc., Bowers + Kubota Consulting, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Dexter C. Kubota Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 04/11/2022. Transcript due 05/10/2022. Appellants Brian J. Bowers, Bowers + Kubota Consulting, Inc., Bowers + Kubota Consulting, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Dexter C. Kubota opening brief due 06/20/2022. Appellee Martin J. Walsh answering brief due 07/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12393760] (RT) [Entered: 03/14/2022 11:50 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martin Walsh v. Brian Bowers, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Represented By: Jing Acosta
Represented By: Elisabeth Nolte
Represented By: Christine Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BRIAN J. BOWERS, an individual
Represented By: William Matsujiro Harstad Esquire
Represented By: David Richard Johanson I
Represented By: Douglas Andrew Rubel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DEXTER C. KUBOTA, an individual
Represented By: William Matsujiro Harstad Esquire
Represented By: David Richard Johanson I
Represented By: Douglas Andrew Rubel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC., a corporation
Represented By: Scott Ira Batterman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
Represented By: Scott Ira Batterman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?