Martinez-Valencia v. Garland
| JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ-VALENCIA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1541 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 41 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 35 by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 40 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Sandra S. IKUTA, Bridget S. BADE, Daniel A. BRESS) Martinez-Valencias motion to substitute his reply brief is granted. The reply brief filed on July 11, 2023 is substituted in place of the reply brief filed on July 6, 2023. PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 10/18/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 39 SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Sandra S. IKUTA, Bridget S. BADE, Daniel A. BRESS. [Entered: 10/16/2023 10:36 AM] |
Filing 38
ORDER FILED. The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, this case is ordered submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on October 16, 2023, in Phoenix, Arizona. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 09/06/2023 01:55 PM]
|
| Filing 37 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Siovhan Sheridan Ayala for Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 08/07/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 36 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Monday, October 16, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Ceremonial Ctrm Phoenix - Scheduled Location: Phoenix AZ View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-1541] [Entered: 08/06/2023 06:19 AM] |
| Filing 35 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 07/11/2023 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 34 MOTION to file replacement brief filed by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 07/11/2023 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 33 STRICKEN PER MEMORANDUM [DE 40] --- REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:28 PM] [Edited: 10/18/2023 02:01 PM] |
|
Filing 32
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 31) denied. Filer requested a previous extension of time. The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 07/05/2023 03:31 PM]
|
| Filing 31 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 07/05/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 30 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Phoenix, AZ. Please review the Phoenix sitting dates for October 16-20, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 06/20/2023 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:29 PM] |
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/16/2023 03:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 7/06/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:34 AM]
|
| Filing 26 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/16/2023 04:48 AM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 19, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:31 PM]
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/14/2023 06:14 AM] |
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 21) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 4/19/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/17/2023 09:14 AM]
|
| Filing 21 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/17/2023 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia received. [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent John Frederick Stanton representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/23/2023 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/23/2023 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing John Frederick Stanton. [Entered: 01/23/2023 06:14 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:47 PM]
|
| Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 01/18/2023 01:27 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/18/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/20/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:51 PM]
|
| Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 11/16/2022 03:31 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:54 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:51:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:45:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent John Frederick Stanton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/15/2022 01:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Frederick Stanton for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/15/2022 12:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Fee Paid by Jose Angel Martinez-Valencia. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2602303-ACMS. [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:50:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/20/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 11/10/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/19/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 2/17/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:05:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/15/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1541 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:01:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 8/26/2022. [Entered: 09/15/2022 07:54:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 09/15/2022 07:53:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Martinez-Valencia v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ-VALENCIA | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Siovhan Sheridan Ayala |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Edward C. Durant |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. John Frederick Stanton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
