Jamilah Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc., et al
| JAMILAH TALIBAH ABDUL-HAQQ |
| PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, TERYE GAUSTAD, DENNIS RAMAS, ROBERTO MARTINEZ, SONYA BROOKS, KAROL BURNETT-QUICK, SHELLEY ROMBOUGH, BERNARD TYSON, GREGORY ADAMS and CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION |
| 22-15417 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, JBR and PJW) [12447230] (DJV) [Entered: 05/16/2022 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc., 776 F.2d 1414, 1416 (9th Cir. 1985) (order disposing of fewer than all claims or parties is not appealable absent express determination from district court that there is no just reason for delay under Rule 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12428594] (AF) [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jamilah Talibah Abdul-Haqq opening brief due 05/23/2022. Appellees Gregory Adams, Sonya Brooks, Karol Burnett-Quick, California Nurses Association, Terye Gaustad, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Roberto Martinez, Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Dennis Ramas, Shelley Rombough and Bernard Tyson answering brief due 06/23/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12401701] (RT) [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
