Rabab Abdulhadi v. Board of Trustees of the CA State University, et al
Defendant: SUE V. ROSSER
Plaintiff / Appellant: RABAB ABDULHADI
Defendant / Appellee: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LESLIE WONG and JENNIFER SUMMIT
Case Number: 22-15493
Filed: April 5, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2022 Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: RGA) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12433950] (RY) [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:19 PM]
April 27, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees Board of Trustees of the California State University, Jennifer Summit and Leslie Wong Joint Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 04/27/2022. [12432637] [22-15493] (Heckenlively, Bryan) [Entered: 04/27/2022 01:56 PM]
April 5, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 05/04/2022. Transcript due 06/03/2022. Appellant Rabab Abdulhadi opening brief due 07/13/2022. Appellees Board of Trustees of the California State University, Jennifer Summit and Leslie Wong answering brief due 08/12/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12413146] (JBS) [Entered: 04/05/2022 02:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rabab Abdulhadi v. Board of Trustees of the CA State University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RABAB ABDULHADI
Represented By: Rabab Abdulhadi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: Bryan H. Heckenlively
Represented By: Bradley S. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LESLIE WONG
Represented By: Bryan H. Heckenlively
Represented By: Bradley S. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JENNIFER SUMMIT
Represented By: Bryan H. Heckenlively
Represented By: Bradley S. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUE V. ROSSER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?