State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
| STATE OF ARIZONA |
| ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense |
| 22-15519 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The unopposed motion to stay appellate proceedings until July 15, 2022 (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. No later than July 15, 2022, appellant shall file a written status report and/or motion for appropriate relief. [12433910] (TSP) [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) John Edward Bies for party(s) Appellee Tae Johnson Appellee Lloyd Austin Appellee USDHS Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas Appellee Troy Miller Appellee DOD, in case 22-15519. [12433086] (DJV) [Entered: 04/28/2022 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John Edward Bies (U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7415 Washington, DC 20044) for Appellees Lloyd Austin, DOD, Tae Johnson, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Troy Miller and USDHS. Date of service: 04/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12433078] [22-15519] (Bies, John) [Entered: 04/28/2022 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant State of Arizona Unopposed Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 04/26/2022. [12431513] [22-15519] (Ensign, Drew) [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/15/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12423318]. [22-15519] (AD) [Entered: 04/15/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant State of Arizona Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/15/2022. [12423031] [22-15519] (Ensign, Drew) [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed April 8, 2022 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than May 6, 2022; the answering brief is due June 3, 2022 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12418433] (AF) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12417148] (RT) [Entered: 04/11/2022 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA | |
| Represented By: | Drew C. Ensign |
| Represented By: | Robert John Makar |
| Represented By: | Brunn W. Roysden III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense | |
| Represented By: | Tyler McVeigh Alexander Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Edward Bies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
