Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Robert Neuschmid
| BLUFFORD HAYES, Jr. |
| ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden |
| 22-15528 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Blufford Hayes, Jr. motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Mr. William Richard Such for Appellant Blufford Hayes, Jr. motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 05/04/2022. [12437896] [22-15528] (Such, William) [Entered: 05/04/2022 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Blufford Hayes, Jr. response to Court order dated 04/20/2022. Date of service: 04/26/2022. [12431786] [22-15528] (Such, William) [Entered: 04/26/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Blufford Hayes, Jr. Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 04/21/2022. [12427477] [22-15528] (Such, William) [Entered: 04/21/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): Appellant was represented in the district court by attorney William Richard Such. On April 8, 2022, counsel Such electronically transmitted from his electronic filing account a notice of appeal, purportedly pro se on behalf of appellant. Counsel Such has not been granted leave to withdraw by the district court or this court. Counsel has the duty to continue to represent the appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, even though the notice of appeal was purportedly filed pro se, it was electronically filed from counsel Suchs account and he remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal. The Clerk will serve this order on counsel Such, who must serve a copy of this order on appellant and provide proof of service to this court showing appellants current address and registration number within 21 days after the date of this order. Counsel must also, within 21 days after the date of this order, either notify this court that he intends to represent appellant on appeal or file a motion to withdraw under Ninth Circuit Rule 4-1(c). [12426355] (WL) [Entered: 04/20/2022 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/10/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12417587] (WL) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Robert Neuschmid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: BLUFFORD HAYES, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | William Richard Such |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden | |
| Represented By: | David Andrew Eldridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
