FNMA/Fannie Mae v. Ernest Aldridge, et al
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS 4 U, LLC, GERI L. MCKINNON, CLARENCE MOSES WILLIS, JORGE M. LUNA, Defendant in member case no. 2:21-cv-1816, IRENA DAMIANOVA, Defendant in member case no. 2:21-cv-1816 and THOMAS E. WILLIS, Defendant in member case no. 2:21-cv-1913 |
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION |
ERNEST C. ALDRIDGE |
22-15562 |
April 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee FNMA/Fannie Mae response to motion ([ # 3 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 06/16/2022. [12473389] [22-15562] (Miller, Christina) [Entered: 06/16/2022 03:13 PM] |
Filing 4 Streamlined request by Appellant Ernest C. Aldridge to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12469768] (JN) [Entered: 06/13/2022 12:37 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ernest C. Aldridge FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/06/2022. [12467686] (RL) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:18 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12450111] (CKP) [Entered: 05/18/2022 12:24 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ernest C. Aldridge opening brief due 06/13/2022. Appellee Federal National Mortgage Association answering brief due 07/13/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12423894] (JBS) [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.