Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
| KENNETH L. LENK |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. |
| 22-15568 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) On September 7, 2022, this court extended the deadlines for appellant to either to pay the filing fees or move to proceed in forma pauperis, and to file the opening brief. The September 7, 2022 order warned appellant that failure to comply would result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk of the Court. Although appellant filed a notice of intent to prosecute, a review of the record reflects that appellant has not paid the filing fees or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or filed a timely opening brief. Accordingly, this appeal No. 22-15568 is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order served on the district court will, 21 days after the date of the order, act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 22-15568. [12590293] (JBS) [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk notice of intent to prosecute appeals (if warranted). Dated 09/22/2022. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12549429] (RL) [Entered: 09/26/2022 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): Appellants motion to consolidate this appeal with closed appeal No. 21-17035 is denied [ # 6 ]. Any requests for relief related to appeal No. 21-17035 must be filed in that docket. This appeal No. 22-15568 challenges the district courts March 18, 2022 order granting in part and denying in part appellees motion for prevailing party attorneys fees, and April 18, 2022 order denying appellants motion seeking relief from the March 18, 2022 attorneys fees order. On April 21, 2022, and June 21, 2022, this court issued orders directing appellant to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the record reflects that appellant has not complied with the courts orders. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant must pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or submit to this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court sua sponte extends the time to file the opening brief for this appeal. The opening brief is due October 7, 2022. The answering brief is due November 7, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, regardless of further filings. The Clerk will send appellant a Form 4 financial affidavit. [12535092] (CKP) [Entered: 09/07/2022 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk Amened notice to appeal; motion to cimbine appeals. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/27/2022. [12490103] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): This appeal No. 22-15568 challenges the district courts March 18, 2022 order granting in part and denying in part appellees motion for prevailing party attorneys fees, and April 18, 2022 order denying appellants motion seeking relief from the March 18, 2022 attorneys fees order. On April 21, 2022, this court issued an order directing appellant to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the record reflects that appellant has not complied with the courts April 21, 2022 order. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant must pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or submit to this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [12475690] (CKP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12443345] (RL) [Entered: 05/10/2022 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12427726] (CKP) [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-15568: Due] ). [12427723] (CKP) [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk opening brief due 06/21/2022. Appellee Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. answering brief due 07/21/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12425333] (RT) [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH L. LENK | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth L. Lenk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Dylan Bradley Carp Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
