James Potts v. M. Soleimani, et al
| JAMES E. POTTS |
| M. SOLEIMANI, CP&S and A. YOUSSEF, Chief M.D. Wasco State Prison Medical Department |
| 22-15581 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (JSB, ADH and RDN) [12472571] (NAC) [Entered: 06/16/2022 07:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Nascimento v. Dummer, 508 F.3d 905, 908 (9th Cir. 2007) (transfer orders are not directly appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12455923] (JMR) [Entered: 05/25/2022 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James E. Potts opening brief due 06/20/2022. [12427648] (ABT) [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
