Nicholas Hansen v. Theodor Schaefer, et al
| CLARK COUNTY, STEVEN WOLFSON, Clark County District Attorney and SAMUEL KERN, Asst District Attorney |
| NICHOLAS HANSEN |
| THEODOR SCHAEFER, Officer #9087, DARREL DAVIES, Officer #14917, JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION and CORNER INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, AKA The Cromwell |
| 22-15598 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (JSB, ADH and RDN) [12471341] (NAC) [Entered: 06/15/2022 07:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and RYAN D. NELSON) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12455595] (RT) [Entered: 05/24/2022 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nicholas Hansen opening brief due 06/27/2022. Appellees Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Corner Investment Company, LLC, Darrel Davies, Joe Lombardo and Theodor Schaefer answering brief due 07/27/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12430188] (RT) [Entered: 04/25/2022 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
