William Bernal, et al v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, et al
| WILLIAM BERNAL and CELIA BERNAL |
| SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, HINKLEY, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy, SCOTT JONES, Sacramento County Sheriff, RANCHO CORDOVA POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOLSOM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRADSHAW, Folsom Police Officer, COUCH, Sergeant, WINKEL, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy, KENNEDY, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy, SUTTER, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy, CHHLANG, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy, BLISS, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy and QUACKENBUSH, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy |
| 22-15690 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 WILLIAM BERNAL, ET AL V. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The record reflects that the district court entered final judgment in this action on June 27, 2022. This courts May 17, 2022, order to show cause is discharged and briefing in this appeal will proceed. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due August 8, 2022. The answering brief is due September 7, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. (MOATT) [12484983] (RY) [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellees Bliss, Chhlang, Couch, Scott Jones, Kennedy, Quackenbush, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Sutter and Winkel response to order to show cause dated 06/16/2022. Date of service: 06/16/2022. [12473078] [22-15690] (Cahill, Nicole) [Entered: 06/16/2022 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12471282] (CL) [Entered: 06/14/2022 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants Celia Bernal and William Bernal response to order to show cause dated 05/17/2022. Date of service: 06/07/2022. [12466030] [22-15690] (Becker, Matthew) [Entered: 06/07/2022 11:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/14/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12464658] (CL) [Entered: 06/06/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/27/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12458997]. [22-15690] (AD) [Entered: 05/27/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Celia Bernal and William Bernal Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/27/2022. [12458758] [22-15690] (Becker, Matthew) [Entered: 05/27/2022 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12452574] (LW) [Entered: 05/20/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12449255] (AF) [Entered: 05/17/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Celia Bernal and William Bernal Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/13/2022. Appellants Celia Bernal and William Bernal opening brief due 07/11/2022. Appellees Bliss, Bradshaw, Chhlang, Couch, Folsom Police Department, Hinkley, Scott Jones, Kennedy, Quackenbush, Rancho Cordova Police Department, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Sutter and Winkel answering brief due 08/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12440119] (RT) [Entered: 05/06/2022 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
