Harold Montague v. Baker, et al
| HAROLD E. MONTAGUE |
| MS. BAKER, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 22-15722 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Harold E. Montague Motion for a stay. Paper filing deficiency: Case Terminated, Opened in Error. [12472980] (HH) [Entered: 06/16/2022 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Harold E. Montague letter dated 05/25/2022 re: Requesting minutes. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Copy of public docket sent to appellant) [12460805] (HH) [Entered: 06/01/2022 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Harold E. Montague letter dated 05/19/2022 re: request for informantion on higher court. Paper filing deficiency: case closed . [12457577] (DJV) [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet. [12454849] (JR) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Harold E. Montague letter dated 05/16/2022 re: rights were violated. Paper filing deficiency: case closed [12454508] (DJV) [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Harold E. Montague motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: case closed opened in error . Served on 05/16/2022. [12454507] (DJV) [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Case terminated, opened in error. [12445960] (BY) [Entered: 05/13/2022 07:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/12/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12445668] (RT) [Entered: 05/12/2022 02:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
