Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
| ROBERTO DURAND |
| LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY |
| 22-15739 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (JBO, KKL and PJB) [12491550] (JFF) [Entered: 07/12/2022 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS, KENNETH K. LEE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notices of appeal, served and filed on May 13, 2022 and May 16, 2022, were not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on August 27, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12473971] (WL) [Entered: 06/17/2022 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of motion filed in district court re:Motion filed by Appellant Roberto Durand. [12467760] (JFF) [Entered: 06/09/2022 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Roberto Durand motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. . [12456081] (JFF) [Entered: 05/25/2022 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 5/16/2022. [12449362] (HH) [Entered: 05/17/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roberto Durand opening brief due 07/15/2022. [12447969] (JMR) [Entered: 05/16/2022 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
