Eric Hurst v. Estela Derr, et al
ERIC HURST |
ESTELA DERR, KRIS ROBL and DAYTON, Nurse |
22-15776 |
May 23, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (JBO, KKL and PJB) [12489143] (QDL) [Entered: 07/08/2022 08:33 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS, KENNETH K. LEE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12473288] (JMR) [Entered: 06/16/2022 02:32 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Eric Hurst motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12460810] (QDL) [Entered: 06/01/2022 10:48 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Eric Hurst motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12460808] (QDL) [Entered: 06/01/2022 10:47 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eric Hurst opening brief due 07/25/2022. [12453640] (RT) [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.