Ebone East v. PNC Bank, N.A.
| EBONE LEROY EAST |
| PNC BANK, N.A. |
| 22-15803 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Banks and Banking |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Ebone LeRoy East opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/13/2022. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed) [12497363] (SML) [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ebone LeRoy East motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/22/2022. [12481437] (DJV) [Entered: 06/28/2022 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS, KENNETH K. LEE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal and accompanying documents filed in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 12-80063. Appeal No. 22-15803 shall be permitted to proceed. A review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due August 16, 2022. The answering brief is due September 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellee must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. The Clerk will serve a case opening packet and a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant.[12472948] (WL) [Entered: 06/16/2022 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 12-80063. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12459541] (RT) [Entered: 05/31/2022 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ebone East v. PNC Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EBONE LEROY EAST | |
| Represented By: | Ebone LeRoy East |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PNC BANK, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory J. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
