Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Unknown Party, et al
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON |
UNKNOWN PARTY, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, OFFICE OF THE CLERK FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MARICOPA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, named Office of the Public Defender for the County of Maricopa, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROSLYN O. SILVER, DEBORAH M. FINE, DOUGLAS L. RAYES, named Douglas Rayes, RONDA R. FISK, R. KYLE IPSON, MARVIN L. DAVIS, ANGEL R. RAYMOND, AVONDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: And Others |
22-15819 |
June 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richards' Form 29 request for docket, document and laws. [12505461] (HH) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:43 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson Request for recital of oath, affirmation procedures and imperative authorities on the record. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/13/2022. [12505458] (HH) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:41 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson EMERGENCY request for in-person status conference. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/20/2022. [12505454] (HH) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:39 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/27/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12463209] (WL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.