San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, et al v. David Chiu, et al
| SAN FRANCISCANS SUPPORTING PROP B, EDWIN M LEE ASIAN PACIFIC DEMOCRATIC CLUB PAC SPONSORED BY NEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SAN FRANCISCO ADVOCACY and TODD DAVID |
| DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION, CHESA BOUDIN, in his official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO |
| 22-15824 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 NO ON E, SAN FRANCISCANS OPPOSING THE AFFORDABLE, ET AL V. DAVID CHIU, ET AL
|
|
NO ON E, SAN FRANCISCANS OPPOSING THE AFFORDABLE, ET AL V. DAVID CHIU, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 11 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by appellees. [12508575] (NAR) [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 16 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 10 ] filed by appellees. [12508572] (NAR) [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Attorney Tara Michelle Steeley, Esquire for Appellees Chesa Boudin, David Chiu, City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Ethics Commission response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 08/02/2022. [12507273] [22-15824] (Steeley, Tara) [Entered: 08/02/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 10 ] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 11 ] submitted by appellees are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12507231] (JMR) [Entered: 08/02/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Alan Gura for Appellants Todd David, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and San Franciscans Supporting Prop B response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 08/02/2022. [12507038] [22-15824] (Gura, Alan) [Entered: 08/02/2022 07:01 AM] |
| Filing 12 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2022 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12506468] (AML) [Entered: 08/01/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellees Chesa Boudin, David Chiu, City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Ethics Commission. Date of service: 07/29/2022. [12505425] [22-15824] (Steeley, Tara) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Chesa Boudin, David Chiu, City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Ethics Commission. Date of service: 07/29/2022. [12505423] [22-15824] (Steeley, Tara) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 5 ] filed by appellants. [12492204] (NAR) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 6 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by appellants. [12492200] (NAR) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 5 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 6 ] submitted by appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12486512] (JMR) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Todd David, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and San Franciscans Supporting Prop B. Date of service: 07/01/2022. [12485349] [22-15824] (Gura, Alan) [Entered: 07/01/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Todd David, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and San Franciscans Supporting Prop B. Date of service: 07/01/2022. [12485340] [22-15824] (Gura, Alan) [Entered: 07/01/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/08/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12467030]. [22-15824] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Todd David, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and San Franciscans Supporting Prop B Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/08/2022. [12467010] [22-15824] (Gura, Alan) [Entered: 06/08/2022 07:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SH): The appeal filed June 3, 2022 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than July 1, 2022; the answering brief is due July 29, 2022 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12464811] (AF) [Entered: 06/06/2022 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12464019] (RT) [Entered: 06/06/2022 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
