Roman Melikov v. Ghilotti Bros., Inc.
| ROMAN MELIKOV |
| GHILOTTI BROS., INC. |
| 22-15901 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ROMAN MELIKOV V. GHILOTTI BROS., INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 9 ] submitted by Roman Melikov is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 10 ] submitted by Roman Melikov are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12513706] (LA) [Entered: 08/10/2022 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Roman Melikov. Date of service: 08/08/2022. [12511248] [22-15901]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs. 08/10/2022 by LA] (Melikov, Roman) [Entered: 08/08/2022 04:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Roman Melikov. Date of service: 08/08/2022. [12511247] [22-15901] (Melikov, Roman) [Entered: 08/08/2022 04:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12504896] (ABT) [Entered: 07/29/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 Mail returned on 07/08/2022 addressed to Mr. Michael James Boland for Ghilotti Bros., Inc., re: [ # 2 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, unclaimed, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; counsel has registered for CM/ECF. [12492830] (LA) [Entered: 07/13/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in that pilot project. By July 20, 2022, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or in the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (Jonathan_Westen@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Jonathan Westen, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12483322] (AF) [Entered: 06/29/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-15901: Paid] ). [12481396] (DJV) [Entered: 06/28/2022 07:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Roman Melikov response to Court order dated 06/21/2022. Date of service: 06/27/2022. [12481299] [22-15901] (Melikov, Roman) [Entered: 06/27/2022 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/24/2022. [12480794] (RT) [Entered: 06/27/2022 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12476057] (CKP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roman Melikov opening brief due 08/15/2022. Appellee Ghilotti Bros., Inc. answering brief due 09/13/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12472703] (JMR) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roman Melikov v. Ghilotti Bros., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ROMAN MELIKOV | |
| Represented By: | Roman Melikov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GHILOTTI BROS., INC. | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Boland Esquire |
| Represented By: | Michael James Boland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
