In re: USA, et al v. Anthony Levandowski
| In the Matter of: ANTHONY SCOTT LEVANDOWSKI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service |
| CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD |
| ANTHONY SCOTT LEVANDOWSKI, Debtor in Possession and OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Trustee |
| 22-15909 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellee California Franchise Tax Board response non-opposing motion ([ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 06/24/2022. [12479078] [22-15909] (Porter, Cara) [Entered: 06/24/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 13 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/22/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12477106]. [22-15909] (AD) [Entered: 06/22/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant USA Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/22/2022. [12476865] [22-15909] (Johnshoy, Matthew) [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Kim for party(s) Appellee Anthony Scott Levandowski, in case 22-15909. [12476834] (DJV) [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew, Kim (Goodwin Procter LLP 1900 N Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-1612) for Appellee Anthony Scott Levandowski. Date of service: 06/22/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12476808] [22-15909] (Kim, Andrew) [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed June 17, 2022 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than July 15, 2022; the answering brief is due August 12, 2022 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12475717] (OC) [Entered: 06/21/2022 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay. The request for an immediate administrative stay is granted. The bankruptcy courts May 2, 2022 orders are temporarily stayed pending resolution of the emergency motion at Docket Entry No. 7. The court will address the emergency stay motion by separate order. Responses to the emergency motion are due by 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Monday, June 27, 2022. An optional reply is due by 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, June 29, 2022.[12474782] (SVG) [Entered: 06/18/2022 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant USA EMERGENCY Motion for miscellaneous relief [Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 for a Stay Pending Appeal and for an Immediate Administrative Stay of the Bankruptcy Courts tax order and confirmation Order Relief needed by June 21, 2022]. Date of service: 06/17/2022. [12474732] [22-15909] (Johnshoy, Matthew) [Entered: 06/17/2022 05:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney Matthew Steven Johnshoy for Appellant USA, in case 22-15909. [12474720] (HH) [Entered: 06/17/2022 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorneys Jennifer Marie Rubin and Francesca Ugolini for Appellant USA, in case 22-15909. [12474717] (HH) [Entered: 06/17/2022 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Francesca Ugolini (U.S. Department of Justice/Tax Division/Appellate Section, P.O. Box 502, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellant USA. Date of service: 06/17/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12474689] [22-15909] (Ugolini, Francesca) [Entered: 06/17/2022 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jennifer M. Rubin (co-counsel) (U.S. Department of Justice/Tax Division/Appellate Section, P.O. Box 502, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellant USA. Date of service: 06/17/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12474687] [22-15909] (Rubin, Jennifer) [Entered: 06/17/2022 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew S. Johnshoy (lead counsel) (U.S. Department of Justice/Tax Division/Appellate Section, P.O. Box 502, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellant USA. Date of service: 06/17/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12474679] [22-15909] (Johnshoy, Matthew) [Entered: 06/17/2022 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12474586] (RT) [Entered: 06/17/2022 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
