Christopher Calise, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
| CHRISTOPHER CALISE and ANASTASIA GROSCHEN |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. |
| 22-15910 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CHRISTOPHER CALISE, ET AL V. META PLATFORMS, INC. |
 Calise v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 53 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO EUGENE E. SILER, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON. The audio and video recordings of this hearing are available on our website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ . [12811047] (NAR) [Entered: 10/17/2023 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 52 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 a.m. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 20) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 10/04/2023. [12804736] [22-15910] (Boutrous, Theodore) [Entered: 10/04/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 51 Added Attorney(s) Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. for party(s) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-15910. [12804406] (NAC) [Entered: 10/04/2023 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 50 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 10/04/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12804387] [22-15910] (Boutrous, Theodore) [Entered: 10/04/2023 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 49 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 09/22/2023. [12797008] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 09/22/2023 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 48 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Rosemarie T. Ring for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 a.m. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 20) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/19/2023. [12795375] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 09/19/2023 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 47 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mark Reich for Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 a.m. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/19/2023. [12794954] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 09/19/2023 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 46 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 09/13/2023. [12791576] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 09/13/2023 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 45 Notice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, October 17, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available # here . At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Tuesday, October 17, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12768835]. [22-15910] (KS) [Entered: 08/06/2023 06:23 AM] |
| Filing 44 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 07/18/2023. [12757539] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 43 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 07/06/2023. [12750026] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 42 Filed (ECF) Attorney Rosemarie T. Ring for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/27/2023. [12744332] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 06/27/2023 07:10 PM] |
| Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mark Reich for Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/27/2023. [12743548] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 06/27/2023 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 40 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for October 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12742014]. [22-15910] (KS) [Entered: 06/23/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 39 Filed (ECF) Attorney Rosemarie T. Ring for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/06/2023. [12730319] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 06/06/2023 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 38 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mark Reich for Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/06/2023. [12729961] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 37 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for September 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12727048]. [22-15910] (KS) [Entered: 06/01/2023 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 36 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 32 ] filed by Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. [12714255] (NAR) [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 35 Filed (ECF) Attorney Rosemarie T. Ring for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 05/09/2023. [12712367] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mark Reich for Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 05/09/2023. [12712199] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 05/09/2023 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 33 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 32 ] submitted by Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12710149] (LA) [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 32 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. Date of service: 05/05/2023. [12710105] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 05/05/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 31 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for August 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12709302]. [22-15910] (KS) [Entered: 05/04/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Attorney Rosemarie T. Ring for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 04/04/2023. [12689132] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 04/04/2023 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mark Reich for Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 04/03/2023. [12687827] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 04/03/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 28 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for July 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12685720]. [22-15910] (KS) [Entered: 03/30/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 27 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MK-S): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 26 ]) for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted in part. The reply brief is due May 5, 2023. To facilitate timely submission of cases for decision, no further motions for extensions of time to file the reply brief will be granted absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances. If the reply brief is not filed by May 5, 2023, the case may be submitted on the briefs already on file. [12677768] (AF) [Entered: 03/20/2023 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 26 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen Motion to extend time to file Reply brief until 06/05/2023. Date of service: 03/17/2023. [12676285] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 03/17/2023 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 25 Streamlined request [24] by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 04/05/2023. [12660656] (DR) [Entered: 02/24/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. New requested due date is 04/05/2023. [12660429] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 02/24/2023 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 23 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 21 ] filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. [12656090] (SD) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 21 ] submitted by Meta Platforms, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12653599] (LA) [Entered: 02/15/2023 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 21 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 02/13/2023. [12652396] [22-15910] (Ring, Rosemarie) [Entered: 02/13/2023 07:18 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 19 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.; Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 02/13/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12619492] (GS) [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 02/13/2023. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617535] [22-15910] (Chorba, Christopher) [Entered: 12/23/2022 06:36 PM] |
| Filing 18 Streamlined request [17] by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 01/13/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12599604] (DLM) [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. New requested due date is 01/13/2023. [12599566] [22-15910] (Weese, Jeremy) [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 16 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 12 ] filed by Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. [12590203] (SD) [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 15 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 13 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. [12590200] (SD) [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 12 ] submitted by Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 13 ] submitted by Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12587062] (LA) [Entered: 11/14/2022 06:19 PM] |
| Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. Date of service: 11/14/2022. [12586982] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. Date of service: 11/14/2022. [12586980] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 14, 2022. The answering brief is due December 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12532168] (RY) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 11/14/2022. Date of service: 08/26/2022. [12527063] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 08/26/2022 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12504973] (VS) [Entered: 07/29/2022 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen opening brief due 09/14/2022. Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 10/14/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12500271] (DLM) [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen. New requested due date is 09/14/2022. [12499706] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 07/22/2022 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 07/15/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12484823] (VS) [Entered: 07/01/2022 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Jeremy Allen Weese for party(s) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-15910. [12483983] (DJV) [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jeremy Allen Weese (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 06/30/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12483975] [22-15910] (Weese, Jeremy) [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/24/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12479364]. [22-15910] (AD) [Entered: 06/24/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/24/2022. [12479345] [22-15910] (Reich, Mark) [Entered: 06/24/2022 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/24/2022. Appellants Christopher Calise and Anastasia Groschen opening brief due 08/15/2022. Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 09/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12474596] (JBS) [Entered: 06/17/2022 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
