Ricky Mendoza v. William Sullivan
RICKY MENDOZA |
WILLIAM SULLIVAN, Warden |
22-15933 |
June 24, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
RICKY MENDOZA V. WILLIAM SULLIVAN |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ricky Mendoza opening brief due 08/25/2022. Appellee William Sullivan answering brief due 09/26/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12479157] (RT) [Entered: 06/24/2022 10:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ricky Mendoza v. William Sullivan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: RICKY MENDOZA | |
Represented By: | Randi Covin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: WILLIAM SULLIVAN, Warden | |
Represented By: | Michele Swanson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.