Tayo Daramola v. Oracle America, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAYO E. DARAMOLA
Defendant / Appellee: ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, on its own behalf and through its wholly owned subsidiaries NetSuite Inc., and Oracle Canada, PAT MERELL, MITA PATNIAK, JAMES BORK, DIONIS GAUVIN, DOUG HARRIS and DOUG RISEBERG
Case Number: 22-15959
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 6, 2024 Summary DARAMOLA V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2022 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12505102] (VS) [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:16 PM]
July 14, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/29/2022 , 11:00 a.m.Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 07/28/2022 ). [12493612] (VS) [Entered: 07/14/2022 09:45 AM]
July 14, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/28/2022, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12493537] (VS) [Entered: 07/14/2022 08:49 AM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/05/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12486827]. [22-15959] (AD) [Entered: 07/05/2022 06:44 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tayo E. Daramola Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/05/2022. [12486817] [22-15959] (Schultz, Mary) [Entered: 07/05/2022 06:28 PM]
June 28, 2022 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12482169] (RL) [Entered: 06/28/2022 02:35 PM]
June 28, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tayo E. Daramola Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2022. Appellant Tayo E. Daramola opening brief due 08/29/2022. Appellees James Bork, Dionis Gauvin, Doug Harris, Pat Merell, Oracle America, Inc., Mita Patniak and Doug Riseberg answering brief due 09/29/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12482077] (RT) [Entered: 06/28/2022 02:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tayo Daramola v. Oracle America, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TAYO E. DARAMOLA
Represented By: Mary E. Schultz Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, on its own behalf and through its wholly owned subsidiaries NetSuite Inc., and Oracle Canada
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAT MERELL
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MITA PATNIAK
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES BORK
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DIONIS GAUVIN
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOUG HARRIS
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOUG RISEBERG
Represented By: Sarah E. Bouchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?