Christopher Chamberlin v. Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER BAYRE CHAMBERLIN
Defendant / Appellee: HARTOG, BAER & HAND, APC, DAVID WALTER BAER, JOHN A. HARTOG and MARGARET M. HAND
3Rd Party Defendant: COLDWELL BANKER REALTY
Case Number: 22-16049
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 24, 2023 CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERLIN V. HARTOG, BAER & HAND, APC, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (KS): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12541350] (ABT) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:03 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (KS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in that pilot project. By August 30, 2022, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or in the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (Kay_Suk@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Kyungah Suk, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12518110] (ABT) [Entered: 08/16/2022 01:19 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) to correct the case caption is denied as unnecessary because Coldwell Banker Realty is not listed on the courts docket as a party to this appeal. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12505310] (RY) [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:20 PM]
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Christopher Bayre Chamberlin Motion for miscellaneous relief [CORRECT CASE CAPTION]. Date of service: 07/25/2022. [12501043] [22-16049] (Chamberlin, Christopher) [Entered: 07/25/2022 10:51 AM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 08/18/2022. Transcript due 09/19/2022. Appellant Christopher Bayre Chamberlin opening brief due 10/27/2022. Appellees David Walter Baer, Margaret M. Hand, John A. Hartog and Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC answering brief due 11/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12497524] (RT) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Chamberlin v. Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER BAYRE CHAMBERLIN
Represented By: Christopher Bayre Chamberlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HARTOG, BAER & HAND, APC
Represented By: Thomas J. D'Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID WALTER BAER
Represented By: Thomas J. D'Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN A. HARTOG
Represented By: Thomas J. D'Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARGARET M. HAND
Represented By: Thomas J. D'Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: COLDWELL BANKER REALTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?