Gerard Karlen, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
| GERARD KARLEN and CARLA KARLEN |
| WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 2007-2 TRUST |
| 22-16050 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Accommodations |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMS, DFO and DJF) [12536640] (RL) [Entered: 09/09/2022 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and DANIELLE J. FORREST) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Nascimento v. Dummer, 508 F.3d 905, 908 (9th Cir. 2007) (transfer order not directly appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12520501] (OC) [Entered: 08/18/2022 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 08/11/2022. [12515267] (RT) [Entered: 08/11/2022 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Carla Karlen and Gerard Karlen opening brief due 09/16/2022. Appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-2 Trust answering brief due 10/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12497483] (JMR) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
