Martin Foster v. Gavin Newsom

Martin Foster v. Gavin Newsom

Plaintiff / Appellant:	MARTIN LEE FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:	GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California
Case Number:	22-16103
Filed:	July 26, 2022
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2022	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because April 21, 2022 order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on July 19, 2022. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12504354] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:15 PM]
July 26, 2022	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Martin Lee Foster opening brief due 09/19/2022. [12502470] (JBS) [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:03 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2022

Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because April 21, 2022 order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on July 19, 2022. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12504354] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:15 PM]

July 26, 2022

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Martin Lee Foster opening brief due 09/19/2022. [12502470] (JBS) [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martin Foster v. Gavin Newsom
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARTIN LEE FOSTER
Represented By:	Martin Lee Foster
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?