Ramon Lupercio v. People of the State of California, et al
| RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO |
| PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MARK LOPEZ, Detective, JOHN P. MORAN, DARRYL B. FERGUSON, Judge, PAUL A. VORTMANN, Judge, PHILLIP J. CLINE and GRIMES |
| 22-16127 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMS, DFO and DJF) [12537845] (JFF) [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and DANIELLE J. FORREST) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, dated July 15, 2022 and filed on July 21, 2022, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on November 2, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1976) (district court must be of the opinion that the criteria of section 1292(b) are met; court of appeals is without authority to assume an appeal unilaterally). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12520788] (WL) [Entered: 08/19/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ramon Navarro Lupercio motion to reopen cases. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/15/2022. [12519079] (HH) [Entered: 08/17/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ramon Navarro Lupercio opening brief due 09/19/2022. [12504476] (ABT) [Entered: 07/28/2022 03:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
