Elizabeth Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIZABETH ROSE WILLIAMS, on behalf of V.E.W. and M.R.D.
Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY, an Agent for the State of Arizona, ARIZONA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, an Agent for the State of Arizona, PAUL E. TANG, an Arizona resident, Retired Judge listed agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County and the United States District of Arizona, RANDI L. BURNETT, an Arizona resident, Sitting Judge acting agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, CYNTHIA T. KUHN, an Arizona resident; Sitting Judge acting agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, DEREK ANDREW DAVIS, an Arizona resident and Server at Trattoria Pina, WATERFALL, ECONOMIDIS, CALDWALL, HANSHAW AND VILLAMANA, PC, a Business Licensed with the State of Arizona and MCCARTHY LAW FIRM, a Business Licensed with the State of Arizona
Case Number: 22-16131
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Elizabeth Rose Williams opening brief due 09/26/2022. Appellees Arizona Commission On Judicial Conduct, Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, Randi L. Burnett, Derek Andrew Davis, Cynthia T. Kuhn, McCarthy Law Firm, Paul E. Tang and Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwall, Hanshaw and Villamana, PC answering brief due 10/26/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12504949] (JMR) [Entered: 07/29/2022 10:16 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Elizabeth Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ELIZABETH ROSE WILLIAMS, on behalf of V.E.W. and M.R.D.
Represented By: Elizabeth Rose Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY, an Agent for the State of Arizona
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARIZONA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, an Agent for the State of Arizona
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAUL E. TANG, an Arizona resident, Retired Judge listed agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County and the United States District of Arizona
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RANDI L. BURNETT, an Arizona resident, Sitting Judge acting agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County
Represented By: Donald Wilson Jr.
Represented By: Kelley M. Jancaitis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CYNTHIA T. KUHN, an Arizona resident; Sitting Judge acting agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEREK ANDREW DAVIS, an Arizona resident and Server at Trattoria Pina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WATERFALL, ECONOMIDIS, CALDWALL, HANSHAW AND VILLAMANA, PC, a Business Licensed with the State of Arizona
Represented By: Donald Wilson Jr.
Represented By: Kelley M. Jancaitis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MCCARTHY LAW FIRM, a Business Licensed with the State of Arizona
Represented By: Donald Wilson Jr.
Represented By: Kelley M. Jancaitis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?