Joseph Johnson v. A. Meyer, et al
JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON |
A. MEYER, Lt., A. MEDEN, Correctional Officer II, J. MARTINES, Correctional Officer II, TAMMY FOSS, Warden, J. CERMENO, Sgt., A. OYARZABAL, M. MATIAS, Correctional Officer, PEREZ, Correctional Officer, R. SAGADO, Correctional Officer, SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Correctional Warden individual capacities as employee for CDCR, VICTOR SOLIS, Correctional Associate Warden individual capacities as employee for CDCR, JASON MARTINES, Correctional Counselor individual capacities as employee for CDCR, M. PEREZ, Correctional Sergeant individual capacities as employee for CDCR, K. BROWN, Chief Executive Officer of Appeal individual capacities as employee for CDCR, S. SATES, Chief Officer of Appeal individual capacities as employee for CDCR, A. MEYER, S. SAWYER, M. VILLANUEVA and R. SALGADO |
22-16160 |
August 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12508806] (CKP) [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:18 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Jamaul Johnson opening brief due 09/30/2022. Appellees K. Brown, J. Cermeno, Tammy Foss, Shawn Hatton, Warden, J. Martines, Jason Martines, M. Matias, A. Meden, A. Meyer, A. Oyarzabal, Perez, M. Perez, R. Sagado, R. Salgado, S. Sates, S. Sawyer, Victor Solis and M. Villanueva answering brief due 10/31/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12508452] (ABT) [Entered: 08/03/2022 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.