Vincent Biagas, Sr. v. State of California, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINCENT JAMES BIAGAS, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, LANCASTER DIRECTOR AND IT and CUSTODY STAFF MEDICAL
Case Number: 22-16167
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for an order extending time for appeal is treated as a motion for an extension of time to respond to the courts August 30, 2022 order to show cause. The motion for an extension of time (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. Appellants response to the order to show cause is now due October 21, 2022. The Clerk will send appellant a copy of the August 30, 2022 order to show cause. Briefing remains suspended [12548002] (JMR) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:43 PM]
September 19, 2022 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Vincent James Biagas, Sr. motion for order extending time for appeal (extension) "for good cause shows" see Rule 6(b) to grant 30 day custody move Appellant taken all discovery nots. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/13/2022. [12544413] (BJK) [Entered: 09/20/2022 11:21 AM]
August 30, 2022 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12529530] (JBS) [Entered: 08/30/2022 11:50 AM]
August 22, 2022 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Vincent James Biagas, Sr. FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/17/2022. [12523058] (RL) [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:32 PM]
August 8, 2022 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12512270] (CKP) [Entered: 08/08/2022 03:03 PM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Vincent James Biagas Sr. opening brief due 09/30/2022. [12509435] (ABT) [Entered: 08/04/2022 10:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vincent Biagas, Sr. v. State of California, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VINCENT JAMES BIAGAS, Sr.
Represented By: Vincent James Biagas Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LANCASTER DIRECTOR AND IT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CUSTODY STAFF MEDICAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?